Letter Shows that GM Rejected a Better Ignition Switch
- Home /
- Letter Shows that GM Rejected a Better Ignition Switch
On Wednesday, April 16, Joan Claybrook, former head of the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety sent a letter to General Motors CEO explaining that in 2001 GM engineers designed an alternative ignition switch, but the switch was rejected for cost reasons.
According to Claybrook and Ditlow, “General Motors picked a smaller and cheaper ignition switch that cost consumers their lives…”
General Motors Co. chose not to use a more robust ignition-switch part in Chevrolet Cobalts and other small cars while they were being designed, a decision that may have led to deaths, safety advocates said.
GM engineers in 2001 designed an alternative to the switch it used in the 2003 Saturn Ion before it was rejected, apparently for cost reasons, according to a letter sent to Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra today by Joan Claybrook, a former head of the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety.
General Motors picked a smaller and cheaper ignition switch that cost consumers their lives, Claybrook and Ditlow said. Who inside GM made these decisions and at what level?
GM’s handling of a defect now tied to 13 fatalities in accidents, after car engines lost power and air bags failed to deploy, is under investigation by NHTSA and both chambers of Congress. The largest U.S. automaker announced a charge of $1.3 billion for the recall-related repairs of 2.59 million cars in the first quarter.
An internal GM investigation led by Jenner & Block LLC Chairman Anton Valukas is looking into the issues Claybrook and Ditlow raise, James Cain, a GM spokesman, said in an e-mail.
We are hoping that Mr. Valukass findings will be completed within the next 45-60 days, Cain said.
The drawing of a longer spring GM eventually adopted for the ignition switch in its 2008 model year Cobalt was included in documents released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee April 11. A chain of e-mails that explains GMs part change in April 2006 shows the spring used was designed five years earlier.
The part change, approved by GM engineer Ray DeGiorgio, has become a focal part of investigations by Congress and NHTSA. DeGiorgio authorized the change without setting a new part number, in violation of company protocol and accepted engineering practices, and then testified during a deposition that he hadn’t approved the switch, documents show.
Consumer complaints about the ignition key in the Cobalt, Ion and other models slipping out of the run position when bumped — a defect later traced to a too-weak spring that didn’t meet GM specifications — slowed after the part change.
When GM changed the part in 2006, it did not have to develop a new more robust design because GM engineers had already designed the safer switch that GM previously rejected in 2001, Claybrook and Ditlow said.
The drawings of the two springs are part of an October 2013 e-mail exchange between a GM engineer, Brian Stouffer, and a member of the legal staff at the automaker’s parts supplier, Delphi Corp. Stouffer tried to find out why ignition switches in Cobalt sedans sold in 2008 were performing better than switches in older models. Delphi manufactured the ignition switch using a GM design.
The Delphi lawyer told Stouffer in the e-mail that DeGiorgio approved a design change for the ignition switch in 2006 that used a part with a longer spring, which made it work better.
GM said in a timeline sent to regulators earlier this year that at least some people in the company didn’t know about the design change that DeGiorgio approved until 2013.
Barra should have known about the documents identifying this alternative part before testifying to Congress, Claybrook and Ditlow said in the letter.
GM should make public all documents relevant to the decision to use a shorter, cheaper spring in 2001, Claybrook and Ditlow said.
DeGiorgio and another GM engineer, Gary Altman, were suspended by the Detroit-based automaker April 10, according to people familiar with the matter. The company announced they had put employees on paid leave over their roles in the recall without naming them.
Altman led the engineering team working on the Cobalt and rejected a part fix as too expensive.
Free Case Evaluation
Your message has been sent
Thank you for your message, we will get back to you soon.
I was recently served court documents that I was being sued from an accident that happened years ago. For someone who has never been through something like this and not familiar with the court lingo or where to even begin, it was very frustrating and stressful. I reached out to a family member who knew Tracy Laskos and the great reputation of Phillips Law Group and within the hours of the initial call for help, I had a direct number to Lead Attorney Nassar. Nassar heard my case and almost instantly put me at ease by explaining the process and how easy it was to handle. Nassar spoke to me like he was a friend, not like I was a client. I am so grateful to Tracy, Nasar and of course my cousin Stephanie for helping out and giving me the direction that I needed to get through this situation. I plan on referring my friends, family and patients that are in need of a personal injury Attorney to Phillips Law Group. Thank you!!
I’ve been working at Phillips Law Group for nearly four years and I can confidently say this is the best personal injury firm in Arizona to work for. The firm is the best for numerous reasons but to start, Phillips Law Group gives employees opportunities for promotions and growth. I started working within the settlement department, moved to a paralegal assistant and grew to be a pre-litigation paralegal with my own case load. Each attorney I have worked for is extremely knowledgeable, friendly, and easy to talk to. Secondly, I love how Phillips Law shows appreciation for employees. They host Friday Zoom Huddles giving out PTO, goodie bags, special shout outs, bonuses and gift cards. They also host extravagant holiday parties and fun contests during the Holidays! Lastly, the firm cares about giving back to the community, which is a trait I value as well. It’s rewarding to see a fast paced firm taking time out of their busy day to pay it forward. I would highly recommend working at Phillips Law Group!
Great company and awesome service. Thanks Caroline fabos. Kudos to all.
It’s an Honor and a Privilege to work for a company that cares about its employees and clients for 12 years. I’ve seen Management go out of their way to help someone whether it’s a personal matter or work related. I am also reminded of many occasions where a Client needed urgent help and we as a Team were able to get the person immediate assistance. At Phillips Law we make that happen through Teamwork and a dedication to our profession. I’ve had numerous jobs in several other fields, those were just jobs. This is a home. Many of us have been here for quite a few years, it feels like one large extended family.
Phillips law group is the best around!
Positive: Professionalism, Quality, Responsiveness, Value As someone who is familiar with the inner workings of the auto insurance industry I can whole heartedly endorse Steven J. Jones and Phillips law group as someone I would want on my side should litigation take place. They handled my case professionally, honestly, and with satisfactory results which I would not have expected without enlisting their help.
I tried a few previous law firms and none would take my car accident case with confidence they could get my anything. Phillips law group took my case and although it took around 4 years to get this case settled as I was in treatment, they never let up with insurance adjusters and they got me as much money as possible. They worked hard for me and advocated for me. Shoutout to key individuals who worked my case nonstop of the years, Robert Ross & Jasmine, you are AMAZING!
Phillips law group is a great firm! Caroline is great.
Phillips Law Group provides a collaborative environment in which both attorneys and staff work together to achieve the best outcome for clients. As an attorney here at PLG, I’m lucky to be surrounded by seasoned attorneys and knowledgeable staff that share my enthusiasm for helping accident victims. The team here at PLG treats clients with respect and empathy while fighting hard to get the results they deserve.
My paralegal , Caroline , was on top of her game - very responsive and always answered any questions I had and in a timely manner . My attorney Rob ,was the best attorney I ever had . He explained everything in great detail and had a great sense or humor . He really knows how to bring light To tough , unfortunate situations - I would absolutely recommend them at anyone -