Phoenix DUI Lawyers and Ignition Interlock Laws
- Home / Phoenix DUI Attorney /
- Phoenix DUI Lawyers and Ignition Interlock Laws
Being arrested for DUI in Arizona is a serious criminal charge, and the state is known to have some of the toughest DUI laws in the United States. One such law involves the requirement to have an Ignition Interlock Device, or IID, installed in the personal vehicle or vehicles of someone who is convicted of DUI. Not only is this law becoming more strict with regularity, but there are other burdens and costs associated with the IID that every DUI defendant needs to consider. This IID law is also just one of the many reasons that anyone who faces this charge needs to contact an Arizona DUI defense lawyer as soon as possible to schedule an initial consultation.
The Arizona DUI Ignition Interlock Device Law
As of 2007, Arizona enacted a new law that required all defendants convicted of DUI to have an IID installed in their vehicles. This device forces the driver to basically pass an on-site breathalyzer test in order to be able to drive their vehicles. If the driver does not pass this test, the device will not allow the vehicle to move. It used to be that such a penalty was imposed only on those who had been convicted of multiple DUIs in Arizona. However, the new law moved that schedule up to include anyone who was convicted of DUI.
The Hidden Burdens of the Ignition Interlock Device after Conviction for DUI in Arizona
Aside from the embarrassment that comes with the installation and requirement to use an IID, there are other duties, responsibilities and costs associated with its use. For instance, costs that are the responsibility of the convicted DUI defendant in regards to the IID include:
- The installation fee, which usually costs between $75 and $100
- Maintenance costs
- Lease costs for the technology in the unit, which usually ranges between $65 and $75 per month
- Repair costs
In addition to the costs involved, the DUI defendant is also responsible for the maintenance these IID’s require. Generally, maintenance is required after 30, 60 and 90 days after installation and every 60 days thereafter. The device must also be brought in for inspection after each occurrence when the device returns a reading of a BAC of .03 or higher. These IID’s must also remain in the DUI defendant’s vehicle for one year after their installation.
How to Deal with the Reality of an Arizona Ignition Interlock Device
If you are facing prosecution for DUI in Arizona, the prospect of having to deal with an IID is now very real. Therefore, you need to take every step possible to provide yourself with the best defense. Contact the Arizona DUI lawyers at Montano Arentz & Associates, PLLC today to schedule an initial consultation.
Free Case Evaluation
By submitting your contact information, you agree that we may contact you by telephone (including text) and email in accordance with our Terms and Privacy Policy

Your message has been sent
Thank you for your message, we will get back to you soon.
-
Although my accident was fortunately not a major one, The Phillips Law Group AZ treated it as such. Their staff, specifically Mr Juan Roque was very professional, courteous and most importantly very informative. Mr Roque's attentive service was phenomenal and I highly recommend this firm!
-
It’s an Honor and a Privilege to work for a company that cares about its employees and clients for 12 years. I’ve seen Management go out of their way to help someone whether it’s a personal matter or work related. I am also reminded of many occasions where a Client needed urgent help and we as a Team were able to get the person immediate assistance. At Phillips Law we make that happen through Teamwork and a dedication to our profession. I’ve had numerous jobs in several other fields, those were just jobs. This is a home. Many of us have been here for quite a few years, it feels like one large extended family.
-
The lawyers here are of top quality. Especially Trey Dayes, who was always respectful and hard-working.
-
Sophia H is a pleasure to work with! Thanks for all you do.
-
Kathy Hudson and Donato Giovanatto. Continues to go above and beyond the call of duty. Reaching out to the insurance company about the damage to the vehicle. Forcing them to take responsibility.
-
PLG is the best! Highly recommend. Love that they do so much to help the community.
-
Jon Jamieson was amazing to work with . He came through with all of his promises.
-
Two family members were in a bad wreck a couple of years ago, and as a result called Phillips Law to represent them. Montana Thompson was the attorney assigned to the case with the help of Nemo Farr as legal assistant. Mr. Thompson litigated a very generous settlement for both my stepdaughter and her son. Because my grandson is a minor, I decided to act as conservator for him to ensure the settlement was safe and secure. Montana helped with that process, but it was Nemo who went way above and beyond the call in finding a financial institution to use for the restricted account. There were some glitches in that process but Nemo helped navigate them with a calm expertise which belies his age. I would consider them both great representatives of the level of commitment to their clients and assets to their firm.
-
Liz was great
-
I would like to thank Vanessa Rodriguez for helping me with my case because I was in total shock about the accident. She had listened to all my concerns and had answered every question I had . She was great !!!